Collection and method
Real engine queries or estimates? Protocol, date, archiving of raw answers and published score formulas.
Ten criteria to compare GEO platforms on a stable footing, a checklist to test on your own data and the questions to ask any vendor, Aive included.
Choose a GEO platform on its method before its dashboards. Check how answers are collected, which engines are covered, how many samples a score rests on and how sources are linked. Then assess execution, video, governance, integrations and total cost, and test on your own questions and content.
This guide is published by Aive. Its criteria apply to every vendor, Aive included: use them to question each offer in the same way.
It does not rank any platform. The detailed comparisons, verified on 28 September 2026, set out the cases where each vendor looks like the best fit.
Real engine queries or estimates? Protocol, date, archiving of raw answers and published score formulas.
Which engines and interfaces, in which markets and languages? Any stated coverage should be dated.
How many runs per question, how often, and is the spread shown alongside the score?
Does each mention point to the answer and the cited source? A citation is not a click; a referral is not causation.
From recommendation to action: drafts, sourced content and publishing to activated destinations, with logs.
Is video a usable source: transcript, chapters, timestamped sourced statements, structured data, media experience?
Human approval, roles, audit trail, rights management, documented security and model-training policy.
API, scopes, limits, webhooks, CMS and analytics: a status verified connector by connector, not a wall of logos.
Sites, prompts, models, answers, brands × markets or an agreed scope: the unit determines what you pay for.
Licence, overages, options, support, integration and internal approval time, at comparable usage.
An entry price means little without its unit. Compare at equal scope and usage.
| Vendor | Observed public entry point | Observed main tier | Dominant commercial unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semrush | Free $0 | Starter $199/month; Pro+ $299; Advanced $549 | Sites, keywords, AI prompts, reports and seats |
| Profound | 7-day free trial | Enterprise on quote | Prompts, engines, Agents credits and regions |
| Peec AI | Brand Starter $95/month | Pro $245; Advanced $495; dedicated Agency offers | Prompts × models × frequency |
| AthenaHQ | Essential free | Starter $295/month; Enterprise on quote | AI answers and multipliers |
| Meikai | Starter €90/month | Growth €390; Enterprise €1,300 | Brand × market, prompts and models |
| Aive GEO | Free check, no account | Starter €325 excl. VAT/month (€390 incl. VAT); Professional, Enterprise and Enterprise+ on the Pricing page | Plan and AI credits; GEO Audit on an agreed scope |
Prices observed on 28 September 2026 on vendors’ official pages, in the vendor’s currency, not converted, to be rechecked. Page published by Aive, not an independent benchmark.
Apply the same protocol to every platform you evaluate.
Not necessarily. A team can keep a tracking tool and add an execution chain, or the other way round. In that case, read each tool’s indicators separately, with their method and period, without adding them up.
An AI engine can answer the same question differently depending on when it is asked. Without several runs and visible variance, a score reflects a single answer rather than a trend.
Translate each offer into your real usage: number of questions, engines, markets, frequency, users and options. Then compare total cost at equal scope, without converting currencies without a date and method.
The duration is agreed during scoping, based on the number of questions, engines, markets and content items. It should cover a baseline, an action period and a new measurement, using the same method.
Start with the free check of your website, then the GEO Audit: question panel, engines, markets and period are agreed with you, and the dated report serves as the baseline.